You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)

  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)

  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required

  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Exploring quality challenges and the validity of excellence models

Authors:

Henrik Eriksson , Ida Gremyr , Bjarne Bergquist , Rickard Garvare , Anders Fundin, Håkan Wiklund , Michael Westher , Lars Sörqvist

Publication Type:

Journal article

Venue:

International Journal of Operations and Production Management


Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify and explore important quality-related challenges facing organizations, and investigate how current excellence models incorporate these challenges.Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on a Delphi study of Swedish organizations. Forty-nine challenges were generated and ranked according to importance and the ten top-ranked challenges were compared to the principles of four excellence models.Findings – The excellence models still seem to be relevant since their content matches many of the identified challenges. The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award and the Swedish Institute for Quality models were found to have the most comprehensive coverage, while the International Organization for Standardization model had limited coverage.Research limitations/implications – Three areas for further research were identified: first, how quality management (QM) can evolve in different contexts that have varying needs in terms of adaptive and explorative capabilities; second, the interfaces of QM and sustainability, and ways to understand how customers and stakeholders can be active contributors to improvements; and third, the roles of the owners and board of directors regarding QM, and how to organize and distribute responsibilities of the QM work.Practical implications – There are three important challenges that future revisions of excellence models could address: first, making QM a strategic issue for company owners; second, involving customers in the improvement activities; and third, developing processes that are robust yet still easily adaptable.Originality/value – The Delphi study identified upcoming challenges in the QM area based on input from 188 quality professionals.Keywords ISO 9000, Quality management, Delphi study, Excellence models, EFQM model, MBNQA

Bibtex

@article{Eriksson4627,
author = {Henrik Eriksson and Ida Gremyr and Bjarne Bergquist and Rickard Garvare and Anders Fundin and H{\aa}kan Wiklund and Michael Westher and Lars S{\"o}rqvist},
title = {Exploring quality challenges and the validity of excellence models},
pages = {1201--1221},
month = {October},
year = {2016},
journal = {International Journal of Operations and Production Management },
url = {http://www.ipr.mdu.se/publications/4627-}
}